Ferguson: The Kosher Klan Konspiracy?

Did you hug a Klansman today?

By Mel Goyson

Just how fake is the Ferguson story? I'm not sure yet, and here's why--


The Traditionalist American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan (TAKKKK) and Anonymous have entered into a war of words, pranks, and investigation in the midst of a powderkegged moment in Ferguson, Missouri. The TAKKK have been accused of threatening violence, but my read is that they only threatened to defend the community if necessary. If I'm wrong, feel free to correct me.

And then there was the whole threatening to shoot thing.Which brings up Frank Ancona. This is another level of controversy, as other Klansmen dispute the authenticity of Frank Ancona, based on his Jewishness.

Kosher Klan Konspiracy?

 Is Frank Ancona working for the SPLC and just trying to stoke up racial tension? If so--this is definitely a big government psychological operation, probably start to finish.

Here's the SPLC stoking up the tension using their boy Frankie! 

Watch this video.

The anger in Ferguson is the result of Jewish propaganda, and I don't think the jury of public opinion should decide the guilt of an individual, in this case Darren Wilson. Due process should be maintained and restored, and to demand a court decision is the sort of tactic the KKK used to use. It should not be the tactic aimed at societal injustices, perceived or otherwise.

Everyone, including Darren Wilson, deserves due process. Even if he's actually a KKK member in an actually white KKK (if this matters, which the KKK says it does). Michael Brown deserved fair treatment as well, and I'm not sure he got it.

Also--why doesn't this video mention the SPLC connection??? Was Anonymous able to take over the Twitter KKK page because they're the same people?

Obama's Climate Deal is Cover for Producing New World Order

WE COME IN PEACE

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."-- Albert Einstein


By Lou Saboter

The Asian Pacific Economic summit has lead to a so-called climate change deal which calls for a reduction of carbon dioxide and oxone-causing emissions. As the liberal media ululates and the conservative media yowls, the controlled opposition serves its dark purpose: formation of the New World Order.

I don't believe the two-party political professional wrestling system is the story here. Both sides are just puppets. One side pushing global power as the solution to corporate overreach. The other side pushing corporate overreach as the solution to globalization. Where is the sane side? Nowhere to be seen in the mainstream media.

As usual, things are timed to coincide with an election, and the big, ugly, obscure changes are being instituted, hidden in plain sight, misreported, and against the common interests of nearly all of mankind. Except for a small band of elitists who appear to have decided we should be grateful to them for a history of war, pollution, banksterism, and fear mongering. This deal is being done under an unconstitutional war with ISIS, which is really an attack on Syria's infrastructure and attempt to further pressure Iran, a country that still resists the New World Order's plans. We are also seeing more gestures aimed at forcing North Korea to stop resisting the New World, with no compromises offered.

Meanwhile, remember, powerless American citizens, you are stupid: stupid virus, stupid to accept Obamacare, and represented in Dumb and Dumber To. Yes. Keep that in mind.

Furthermore: China is at the center of this deal. China appears to me to be the model for the New  World Order. It's the land of a censored internet (coming soon to the USA!), forced abortions, low wage workers who have to be prevented from committing suicide on the job, and a population manipulated into abject conformity.

The story being put out in our puppeteer mainstream media is that Obama is protecting us from the Wicked Witch of Global Warming. But the mainstream media barely ever mentioned the Trans Pacific Partnership, which is promted by the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat. This secretive treaty has been described by Jim Tower as a " a supersized and nuclearized NAFTA".  The Trans Pacific Partnership is supported by Monsanto and Wal-Mart. And you're not invited to know the details.

What these deals forming will really do is break down national sovereignty and allow yet more exploitation of the working class by the ruling class of an increasingly international corporate/government hegemony. Just as NAFTA helped to break down the middle class of the United States, forcing workers to compete with workers all over the world, these new deals will break down all protections for citizens against exploitation even further.

On the world stage, there is also no sane side to be seen among the rulers who took part in APEC. Putin and Obama have been playing at WWW III brinkmanship, pushing the entirety of humanity toward a desire for a peaceful conclusion. China is the connector of the two, bringing them all into a unified field of fracking, signified by the Russian-Chinese gas deal brokered just before Obama's emissions deal. 

Meanwhile, there has been no serious sign that fracking will be reducing, although coal plants and emissions will be addressed. The question remains about how can we say global warming is really the point of these negotiations as America continues to be turned into the fracking version of the new Saudi Arabia?

Are we supposed to trust Obama's good intentions? Obama green-lighted fracking. Obama militarized the police. Obama created a secret court to to break the Bill of Rights. Obama harasses journalists, dissenters, and jails whistleblowers. 

Is global warming just a cover to frack our land, poison our water, and ensure Internationalist hegemony? I am rather convinced this is part of it. The resources that the people depend upon are being poisoned or seized. The economic divide is yawning, despite a suspiciously convenient lowering of gas prices, and supposed low unemployment.

Do we know for sure what is causing global warming? Do we really?

Perhaps if I was given the minutes of all the Bilderberg Group meetings, I'd support what is coming out of APEC.

Agenda 21 is going full steam ahead.

Why Obama is Lying about the FCC--Federal Censorship Commission

Psycho Killer
Qu'est-ce que c'est
fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa fa far better
Run run run run run run run away - Talking Heads

By Lou Saboter

The internet, being understood as an extension of speech, a realm of discourse, freedom of exploration and expression, a new text of literary dimensions and democratization of art, a mad realm of memes and collaborations, where porn and poetry flow like milk and honey in a spaceship gravity all nonsense now, is being eyeballed by the Lucifer-worshiping elite as the greatest challenge to their perceived legitimacy.

The FCC, an independent body, wants to change all that free cyber-speeching thanks to the corporate-lizard Obama placed in charge of it. Now that he has unleashed the full forces of oppression on us all through the vehicles of the various intelligence communities, the militarized police, and the ever worsening Obamacare deal, we are supposed to believe this speech--





Meanwhile, the announcement of these all important rules has been put off, so that Obama can suck whatever ill-informed consent he can out of this perfidious tap dancing routine in order to further act upon his illegal war with Syria using the CIA-trained ISIS as his pretext, continue the construction of the frackageddon of America, and further divide the people of the United States from all their wealth and transferring it safely into the hands of the globalizing elite that he truly represents along with the rest of our supposed government.

It is good to remember that the Trojan African always speaks out of both sides of his mouth. When he wanted to be President he promised us transparency. However, it turned out, that he meant he wanted us to be transparent.

And he used to have a promise to watch out for whistleblowers on his webpage, but that went away soon after Edward Snowden fled the country to avoid the same fate as a Barrett Brown, Jeremy Hammond, or Bradley Manning.

Many Democrats wanted to think that Obamacare was really about helping out the "little guy", but Obama quickly traded away the "public option" and Obamacare is quickly revealing itself as the latest extension of corporate slavery it truly represents.

Here's what happened when Obama said all options were on the table--




Many Democrats still make excuses for Obama, as if he were even close to a liberal, or leftist in any way (well, maybe in the Stalinist sense), when in fact he is just a neocon who pushes gay rights and feminism because these things help to unknit Christian communities which represent a threat to his technocratic vision of a total surveillance state, energy as money, and full spectrum dominance of the globe as the "New World Order" furthers its aims.

So, Obama's pretty little speech about protecting net neutrality is merely the ruse of a puppeteer hired by puppeteers further up the brood chain of the true Powers That Be.

Obama's Response to Killing of Michael Brown Nearly the Opposite of his Response to Killing of Trayvon Martin

By Lou Saboter

I will shamefully admit I voted for this maniac. Not only once, either. Such was the cruel nature of the two-party pressures I was subjected to, along with heavy doses of dread about our nation's future. I was afraid that Mitt Romney was more of a plutocrat, and that Ron Paul would shred all programs of social uplift, leaving only corporate power and legal weed in place.

Perhaps he was the best of three terrible choices. I don't recall a candidate who truly seemed on the side of the people, Obama was emblematic of equality and possibly better Supreme Court judges. And I used to be on the fence about gun control.

But this article is about Obama's response to Michael Brown, and how it compares to his response to Trayvon Martin's death--both of which were crimes in my mind.

Obama, when Trayvon was shot, made the statement that Trayvon could have been his son or even him. Some thought he was actually inspiring protest at the time.

 But you could look at it another way. In the case of Trayvon, a civilian shot a man of another race, possibly motivated by race issues. Obama has promoted gun control--but only of civilians. When it comes to the police, Obama has done quite the opposite.

So it is no surprise that hear we aren't hearing anything like "Michael Brown could have been my son."

Now, his rhetoric, after being briefed by Eric "Fast and Furious" Holder, is plainly directed at quelling protest.

The object is a disarmed, obedient citizenry. Eric Holder has even, in the past, openly promoted brainwashing the citizenry into giving up their guns. And he meant "black people."

A Globalist objective is plain here. We are being carefully massaged, beaten, gassed, and shot into it.

The violence is coming from them. They are the ones arming the cops to the teeth. And the crackdowns in Ferguson, Albuquerque, Boston, and New Orleans are the result.